It’s that nobody is inspired by uglyness and nobody wants to use ugly products when there are better options. They didn't have discipline. I do agree that the migration to Python 3 was completely mishandled.
Recently I've been pushed into Python development because the rest of my team adopted it because of a single library that is marginally better than what we had in Ruby. Ruby is a good reference point since it occupies a similar niche in the programming language ecosystem and is roughly the same age. Its a very real possibility that usability or design issues on the front page will negatively affect Python adoption. Or worse, somebody throws in a generator!
I apologize. Java + Gradle (or any of the major build tools) = , "But why even try when there's no real benefit? Builder 02-06-2015 08:57 AM. Java is no stranger to dependency hell either, particularly in the world of EE. Really, people. I would like it more, but too many coders seem to assume that python means that you have permission to write bad code. I need only the JRE on production, and I'm golden :D". I see this is a very old post, but I got here from Google and I have a few criticisms of Python that aren't already here. It doesn't make the code magically better. Its just that, well, ummm…you’re kind of ugly. Electrical engineers can use Maxwell's Equations and derived formulas to state clearly and definitively if a given design will generally work. Am I weird to say that I appreciate how quickly you can find the info you want in the Python documentation? So, you ask, how can I hate Python if I don't know how to write a single line of it? I love the creative aspect of web development and I will really look into the links provided by you, and hopefully create something beautiful in python. Robust Standard Library. Other than that, beats me, I like python, who cares what other people think. Automation, and small things that should just make life more pleasant. def func1(a, b, extra = 5): I don't know for Smalltalk tools per se. Rails developers design beautiful interfaces while Python developers program the missing parts. Above are online interactive tutorials for learning Python vs. Ruby. The bad thing about python is that any idiot can use it. I think things are finally getting there (Django 2 refusing to run on 2.x is a huge step) but wow, what a way to drag things out.
Python Server Side Programming Programming. Somewhere in that timeline Python came out and every time I looked at it, I wanted to read the philosophy behind it because it looked like such a step backward.
Python allows you to chain the comparison operations. Because pretty much every python program ever written by any of my students either doesn't work on another machine in the same cluster that's supposed to be configured identically, or stops working on the VERY SAME machine within a few months when some minor version number changes. Python 3 on the other hand, has the potential of actually being scaleable. I think that people can be unkind when comparing programming languages, often simply to make themselves look smarter. I'm one of the weirdo designers who happened to fall in love with Python later in life and who doesn't really get Ruby; we exist, but it's kinda lonely over here. its in the eye of the beholder. Because straight-line execution performance is, for most applications, far less important than architecture and team productivity. Made with love and Ruby on Rails. I have written code in 1991 that still runs. (Birds of a feather flock together and all that.) Many strongly typed languages allow passing null as any type anyway and I find that a far bigger problem than passing foo when a bar is required. Please. Both are well organized, but it is obvious at a glance who places importance on professional design and who doesn’t. tldr; It's not (just) a matter of knowing to hire a designer or not, it's whether you're actively recruiting designers to code with you and join your community. Currently, my favorite language is C#, especially after xamarin and mono made it portable. The Python blog designs are uninspiring and unpolished, while the Ruby designs are striking. I would be glad to speak with you! I know part of your argument is that Python developers don't care. enormous library structure which allowed people to say "I'll make a thing Makes it more readable. Templates let you quickly answer FAQs or store snippets for re-use. For me, clarity over cleverness is the primary feature of a programming language. I've used both here is my view on it
Reason, ruby on rails is more commonly used in web environments. Built on Forem — the open source software that powers DEV and other inclusive communities. Rails community is noisy. That said, if your team's testing, craft, and review discipline are solid, Python is just fine for projects large and small. And when it isn't, it's very good at calling your favorite compiled code for performance sensitive pieces. Pip is fine. In one project I found over 3000 lines of code specifically dedicated to completely unnecessary encapsulation of ordinary attributes. It does a nice balanced job of explaining and comparing different approaches, including Python's. However, we have had extensive experience tracking down build and test failures caused by cross-language builds where a Python snippet embedded in another language, for instance through a SWIG invocation, is subtly and invisibly broken by a change in the indentation of the surrounding code. So yeah, more often than not I'm more scarred fron the misuse of Python than anything else. I remember when I was learning Java that I had to use upcasting (some of the nio apis, etc).